Tuesday, February 07, 2006

Do Bush Pioneers/Rangers Support The President?

I've had it with all those Republicans-In-Name-Only (RINOs) who want President Bush to fail. Operation Yellow Elephant's talking points have just gotten tougher. Here's what I sent to the NY Times in response to their article, including a nine-page Frequently Asked Questions used by recruiters.

To the Editor:

Our Army's top recruiter, Maj. Gen. Thomas P. Bostick, should go beyond NASCAR, Hot Rods and Professional Bull Riders to attract prospects and encourage their parents to support military service. [Damien Cave story, Feb. 5] He should make the same approach to the Bush Rangers (raised $200,000+) and Bush Pioneers ($100,000-$199,999) who clearly want the President to succeed in Iraq.

Because healthy heterosexuals under 40 are eligible to volunteer, those who support the war have an obligation to consider serving themselves. Those who are not personally eligible who support the war have an obligation to encourage their eligible relatives and friends, their circle of influence, to consider serving. Anyone who supports the war only if "other people" actually fight it really wants President Bush to fail miserably. They are Republicans-In-Name-Only (RINO) and are even worse than liberals. They're traitors.



At 08 February, 2006 09:53, Blogger Rory Shock said...

And now they call for the Eternal War, publicly referred to by Rumsfeld as the "Long War" -- a term that is said to give him something resembling wood, accordiing to my White House spy, Fly-On-the-Wall. This long war is gonna use up a whole lotta "other people." But Rummy, he don't care and he ain't worried about selling the Long War ... see the Selling em the invisible bag of shit post at

At 08 February, 2006 14:14, Anonymous Samwise Galenorn said...

The Bush war machine is running on fumes, and is gearing up for war on Iran and North Korea. Can you say 'Draft' after the 2006 elections?


Post a Comment

<< Home