3 tours of duty in Iraq
Is there any eligible war supporter out there who is still trying to argue that we don't need more troops? Three tours of duty in Iraq on a four-year (or more, depending on stop-loss) enlistment is more than enough for one patriot.
OK, College Republicans and Young Republicans, how about you?
posted by Karl @ 11/22/2005 01:46:00 PM
7 comments
7 Comments:
In the future, all wars will be fought by robots. As it should be.
And seriously, wouldn't spending a couple of YEARS fighting destroy some people?
You seem to be quite active in trying to get college republicans to enroll...
Then why are liberals trying to get military recruitments off college campuses?
Hmmm.....
College Republicans, who support the war, shouldn't have to be recruited...they should be signing up without provocation. But many of them aren't. Get it?
You seem to be quite active in trying to get college republicans to enroll...
Then why are liberals trying to get military recruitments off college campuses?
Hmmm.....
...Because there wouldn't be a need for military recruiters at all if just half of the smug, chickenshit jackasses who flap their gums in favor of the war from the safety of college campuses in the U.S. would put their asses on the line and actually serve in their hero's war.
Oh, you can touch yourself over there and act all smug with your typing hand, but I know you're praying harder than any lib'rul that the Bushies turn tail from Iraq before they call for a draft.
As I said to some other panzy-ass chickenhawk coward today, I don't fight unless I'm attacked. Iraq didn't lift a finger to attack me, so I ain't going to fight Iraq. You think it's a noble cause? Sign up. That's all we are saying: give war a chance (if you love it so). Otherwise, your every word can be envisioned as coming from a quivering, invertebrate Nancy.
C'mon! I dare ya!..............................................
That's what I thought: coward...
" Probably because the author of this blog knows that liberals and most anti-war groups have always been against the war..."
Really? Anti-war groups have always been against war? Your a genius!
How about "liberals always being against the war?" Not when you look at their voting records.
How about that recent vote in the House to pull out troops from Iraq? What was the vote result? Anyone?
How come no liberals are willing to put their money where their mouth is?
Don't try and change the subject, chickenshit. Your non sequitur (House Democrats ignored cynical Republican Straw Man vote, ergo liberals aren't against the war) must be a lame attempt at humor.
It's limp dickheads like you (e.g. your hero Dubya, and Darth Cheney) that are responsible for starting that illegal war, but very few of your kind (pampered armchair hawks) are over there fighting it. Why don't you really show us what you're made of, and make your next troll comment post from a tent in the Green Zone?
Or are you going to give us some more lame horseshit about "supporting the troops from here"? And don't give me any crap about me signing up. I knew this war was b.s. before it started, and I told all you idiots the same beforehand (not that you wingnuts haven't had three years-- and an election-- to sort that out for yourselves). Oh, no: this is your phony war, so take off your cheerleading skirt and go fight it.
Punk-ass coward.
Billy, who's the ugly dude with the cheesy mustache in your picture? Dump the loser, a one bagger like yourself could find a man at any bar at closing time. You don't need him. But first, get him to enlist.
Post a Comment
<< Home